How the calculation actually works
Conduit fill is one division. Add up the cross sectional area of everything going in the pipe, divide by the internal area of the pipe, and compare the result to a percentage. All the difficulty is in picking the right percentage and the right two areas.
Step one: the conduit's internal area
Trade size is a name, not a measurement. Half inch EMT has a bore of 0.622 inches, half inch rigid has 0.632, half inch schedule 40 PVC has 0.602 and half inch schedule 80 PVC has 0.526. Turned into area that spread is much wider than it looks: 0.304 square inches for the EMT against 0.217 for the schedule 80, a difference of 29 percent in the same nominal pipe. Schedule 80 has the same outside diameter as schedule 40 and a much thicker wall, and every thousandth of that wall comes out of the bore.
Area is pi over four times the diameter squared. Everything printed on this page is computed that way from a diameter, not looked up.
Step two: the conductors
Each insulated conductor has a published approximate diameter, which depends on the conductor size and on the insulation over it. Square it, multiply by pi over four, multiply by how many you have, and add the lot together.
Insulation matters more than people expect. A 500 kcmil conductor is 0.7073 square inches in THHN, 0.6984 in XHHW, and 1.0082 in rubber insulated RHH with an outer covering. That last one is 43 percent more pipe for exactly the same copper.
Count everything. Phases, the neutral, travellers, spares you are pulling for later, and the equipment grounding conductor. The ground occupies space like anything else and it counts toward the conductor total that selects your limit.
Step three: the limit
One conductor, 53 percent. Exactly two conductors, 31 percent. Three or more, 40 percent. A nipple of 24 inches or less between two enclosures, 60 percent.
A worked example
A feeder: three 3/0 THHN phase conductors and one 6 AWG THHN equipment ground, in EMT.
- Conductor area
- 3/0 THHN is 0.584 inches across, so 0.2679 square inches each, and three of them is 0.8036. The 6 AWG ground is 0.254 inches across, so 0.0507. Total 0.8543 square inches.
- The limit
- Four conductors, so three or more, so 40 percent.
- Try 1-1/4 inch EMT
- Bore 1.380 inches, area 1.4954 square inches, 40 percent of that is 0.5982. We need 0.8543. Not close.
- Try 1-1/2 inch EMT
- Bore 1.610 inches, area 2.0358 square inches, 40 percent of that is 0.8143. We need 0.8543, so this is 41.96 percent full and it fails, by four hundredths of a square inch. It looks like it should fit and it does not.
- Try 2 inch EMT
- Bore 2.067 inches, area 3.3556 square inches, 40 percent is 1.3422. At 0.8543 the run is 25.5 percent full and it passes with plenty in hand.
The two conductor trap
Take two 6 AWG THHN conductors in half inch EMT. Each is 0.0507 square inches, so 0.1013 together, in a bore of 0.3039 square inches. That is 33.3 percent full.
Against 40 percent it passes with room to spare, and that is what most calculators and most people will tell you. But two conductors are held to 31 percent, which is 0.0942 square inches, and 0.1013 is over it. The run is illegal, and the tool that told you it was fine did so by applying the three or more rule to a case it does not cover.
The reason 31 is lower than both of its neighbours is that two circles in a circle waste space that three or more do not, and a two conductor pull has no third conductor to roll against. It is counterintuitive, it looks like a misprint, and it is the single most reliable source of wrong conduit fill answers there is.
Where this tool will mislead you
It does not derate for heat. More than three current carrying conductors in a raceway means their ampacity has to be reduced, and that is an entirely separate rule with its own table. Four to six conductors lose 20 percent of their ampacity, seven to nine lose 30 percent. A run can sit at 35 percent fill and still be undersized once that is applied. This tool answers the fill question only. The ampacity and derating calculator does the other half.
It does not know about bends. Fill says nothing about how hard the pull will be. Total bend is capped separately, and a run at 39 percent through four bends is a different job from the same run in a straight line.
It uses standardised conductor diameters. Real wire from a real reel is usually within a few thousandths of the published figure and sometimes not. The published figure is what an inspector checks, so it is the right basis for a verdict, but it is not a promise about your reel.
It does not cover everything that goes in a pipe. Compact stranded conductors, bare conductors and multiconductor cables all have their own dimensions and none of them are here. For a multiconductor cable you use the actual outside diameter of the cable, and if there is exactly one of them in the raceway there is a further rule about non circular cables that this tool does not handle.
It is not an inspection. Your local jurisdiction may amend or may be on an older code cycle, and either can change the answer.
Terminology
- Trade size
- The name a conduit is sold under. Not its bore and not its outside diameter. Two conduits of the same trade size in different types hold different amounts.
- Bore
- Internal diameter. The only conduit dimension that matters for fill.
- Equipment grounding conductor
- The bonding conductor that gives fault current a path back. Counts toward fill and toward the conductor count, and never counts as a current carrying conductor for derating.
- Nipple
- A conduit run of 24 inches or less between two enclosures. May be filled to 60 percent.
- Jam ratio
- Conduit bore divided by conductor diameter, for three conductors of the same size. Between about 2.8 and 3.2 they can wedge at a bend.
- kcmil
- Thousands of circular mils, the area unit used above 4/0. A circular mil is the area of a circle one thousandth of an inch across, so it is a conductor area, not an insulated diameter.
Where these numbers come from, and what is not reproduced here
The fill percentages and the jam ratio window are rules. They are stated in this project's own words above, and no table text, note text or commentary from NFPA 70 is reproduced anywhere on this page. The National Electrical Code is copyrighted by the NFPA, who make it free to read online. Free to read is not a licence to republish, and this page does not.
The dimensions are a different thing. Conduit bores and conductor outside diameters are physical measurements of manufactured products, published independently by the people who make them and by the product standards they are made to. This page stores diameters and computes every area from them at run time, rather than reprinting an area column.
Conduit bores were checked against at least two independent sources each. Steel conduit against Engineering ToolBox dimension tables and against ANSI C80.1 and C80.3 wall thicknesses. PVC schedule 40 and 80 were derived independently from Nominal Pipe Size outside diameters and ASTM D1785 wall thicknesses, which reproduce every figure without reference to any electrical source. Intermediate metal conduit was settled by a mass balance: the published weight per hundred feet, at the density of steel, gives a metal cross section that confirms the smaller of the two candidate bores at all nine sizes.
Conductor diameters were verified against two independent transcriptions that agree on all 120 figures used here, and then sanity checked against published product data from Southwire, Encore Wire and Prysmian. Real product straddles the standardised figure in both directions, which is why the FAQ above says what it says about a result at 39.8 percent.
What is deliberately absent. Compact stranded conductors, bare conductors and multiconductor cables are not included, because each needs a dimension set this page does not carry and guessing at them would produce a confident wrong answer. Bores for flexible metal and liquidtight flexible metal conduit rest on fewer independent sources than the rigid types and are marked as such where they appear.
This is a calculator, not an inspection and not legal advice. If a figure here disagrees with your code book or with something you have measured, tell me and it gets fixed.