Feedback

Especially worth telling me: a figure that disagrees with the current Orton chart, a firing case this does not handle, or anything that broke.

Conduit fill calculator

Pick the pipe, add the conductors, get a verdict against the right limit. Including the 31 percent case for exactly two conductors, which is the one nearly everybody gets wrong.

Electrical metallic tubing. Thin wall steel, no threads, pulled together with set screw or compression fittings. The most common raceway in commercial interiors.

Conductors in the run

Add the equipment grounding conductor as its own row. It counts toward fill exactly like a current carrying conductor, and leaving it out is a common way a fill calculation comes out wrong.

The limit depends on how many conductors are in the pipe

There is no single conduit fill percentage. There are three, chosen by conductor count, plus a fourth for very short runs. Everything in the run counts: phases, neutral, travellers, spares and the equipment grounding conductor.

  1. One conductor

    53%

    A single conductor is free to find the middle of the raceway, so it is allowed the most room.

  2. Exactly two conductors

    31%

    The strictest case, and lower than either neighbour. Two round conductors in a round raceway leave dead space that neither can use, and there is no third conductor for them to roll against on a pull.

  3. Three or more conductors

    40%

    The case that applies to nearly every real circuit. Three or more conductors nest, so the usable fraction goes back up.

  4. Any number, in a nipple

    60%

    A length of conduit no more than 24 inches long between two boxes, cabinets or similar enclosures. Too short for heat to build and too short for the pull to be the problem, so the allowance goes up.

Two conductors is the one to watch. Thirty one percent is lower than the fifty three percent allowed for one and lower than the forty percent allowed for three. It is the only place in the table where adding a conductor makes the limit go up, and it is where almost every wrong answer comes from.

Bore and fill area, by conduit type

Internal area is the whole game, and it is not the trade size. Half inch EMT and half inch schedule 80 PVC differ by 29 percent in usable area. Areas below are computed from the internal diameter as pi over four times the diameter squared.

EMT

Electrical metallic tubing. Thin wall steel, no threads, pulled together with set screw or compression fittings. The most common raceway in commercial interiors.

EMT internal area and fill area by trade size
SizeBoreArea2 wires3+ wires
1/20.6220.3040.0940.122
3/40.8240.5330.1650.213
11.0490.8640.2680.346
1-1/41.3801.4960.4640.598
1-1/21.6102.0360.6310.814
22.0673.3561.0401.342
2-1/22.7315.8581.8162.343
33.3568.8462.7423.538
3-1/23.83411.5453.5794.618
44.33414.7534.5735.901

Bore in inches, areas in square inches.

IMC

Intermediate metal conduit. Threaded steel, lighter than rigid and with a thinner wall, so at the same trade size it holds more than either RMC or EMT.

IMC internal area and fill area by trade size
SizeBoreArea2 wires3+ wires
1/20.6600.3420.1060.137
3/40.8640.5860.1820.235
11.1050.9590.2970.384
1-1/41.4481.6470.5100.659
1-1/21.6832.2250.6900.890
22.1503.6311.1251.452
2-1/22.5575.1351.5922.054
33.1767.9222.4563.169
3-1/23.67110.5843.2814.234
44.16613.6314.2265.452

Bore in inches, areas in square inches.

RMC

Rigid metal conduit, the heavy threaded steel. The thickest wall of the three steel raceways, so the smallest bore at a given trade size.

RMC internal area and fill area by trade size
SizeBoreArea2 wires3+ wires
1/20.6320.3140.0970.125
3/40.8360.5490.1700.220
11.0630.8870.2750.355
1-1/41.3941.5260.4730.610
1-1/21.6242.0710.6420.829
22.0833.4081.0561.363
2-1/22.4894.8661.5081.946
33.0907.4992.3253.000
3-1/23.57010.0103.1034.004
44.05012.8823.9945.153
55.07320.2126.2668.085
66.09329.1589.03911.663

Bore in inches, areas in square inches.

PVC Schedule 40

The usual grey plastic conduit. Underground, in slabs, and anywhere corrosion rules out steel.

PVC Schedule 40 internal area and fill area by trade size
SizeBoreArea2 wires3+ wires
1/20.6020.2850.0880.114
3/40.8040.5080.1570.203
11.0290.8320.2580.333
1-1/41.3601.4530.4500.581
1-1/21.5901.9860.6160.794
22.0473.2911.0201.316
2-1/22.4454.6951.4551.878
33.0427.2682.2532.907
3-1/23.5219.7373.0183.895
43.99812.5543.8925.022
55.01619.7616.1267.904
66.03128.5678.85611.427

Bore in inches, areas in square inches.

PVC Schedule 80

Same outside diameter as schedule 40 and a much thicker wall, for runs exposed to physical damage. The bore is far smaller: at 4 inch it loses 10 percent of its area to the wall, which is enough to change a verdict.

PVC Schedule 80 internal area and fill area by trade size
SizeBoreArea2 wires3+ wires
1/20.5260.2170.0670.087
3/40.7220.4090.1270.164
10.9360.6880.2130.275
1-1/41.2551.2370.3830.495
1-1/21.4761.7110.5300.684
21.9132.8740.8911.150
2-1/22.2904.1191.2771.647
32.8646.4421.9972.577
3-1/23.3268.6882.6933.475
43.78611.2583.4904.503
54.76817.8555.5357.142
65.70925.5987.93510.239

Bore in inches, areas in square inches.

ENT

Electrical nonmetallic tubing, the corrugated blue plastic. Made to the same nominal bore as PVC schedule 40 and only up to 2 inch.

ENT internal area and fill area by trade size
SizeBoreArea2 wires3+ wires
1/20.6020.2850.0880.114
3/40.8040.5080.1570.203
11.0290.8320.2580.333
1-1/41.3601.4530.4500.581
1-1/21.5901.9860.6160.794
22.0473.2911.0201.316

Bore in inches, areas in square inches.

FMC

Flexible metal conduit, greenfield. Note that half inch FMC has a slightly larger bore than half inch EMT, and one inch FMC has a smaller one.

Bore figures for corrugated conduit rest on fewer independent sources than the rigid types above. Treat a result within a percent of the limit as a reason to measure.

FMC internal area and fill area by trade size
SizeBoreArea2 wires3+ wires
3/80.3840.1160.0360.046
1/20.6350.3170.0980.127
3/40.8240.5330.1650.213
11.0200.8170.2530.327
1-1/41.2751.2770.3960.511
1-1/21.5381.8580.5760.743
22.0403.2691.0131.307
2-1/22.5004.9091.5221.963
33.0007.0692.1912.827
3-1/23.5009.6212.9833.848
44.00012.5663.8965.027

Bore in inches, areas in square inches.

LFMC

Liquidtight flexible metal conduit, sealtite. The jacket is outside the core, so the bore is close to FMC rather than smaller than it.

Bore figures for corrugated conduit rest on fewer independent sources than the rigid types above. Treat a result within a percent of the limit as a reason to measure.

LFMC internal area and fill area by trade size
SizeBoreArea2 wires3+ wires
3/80.4940.1920.0590.077
1/20.6320.3140.0970.125
3/40.8300.5410.1680.216
11.0540.8730.2700.349
1-1/41.3951.5280.4740.611
1-1/21.5881.9810.6140.792
22.0333.2461.0061.298
2-1/22.4934.8811.5131.953
33.0857.4752.3172.990
3-1/23.5209.7313.0173.893
44.02012.6923.9355.077

Bore in inches, areas in square inches.

Conductor area, by insulation and size

Insulation changes the answer more than people expect. A 500 kcmil conductor is 0.7073 square inches in THHN and 1.0082 square inches in rubber insulated RHH with an outer covering, which is 43 percent more of the same pipe for the same copper.

Approximate cross sectional area in square inches for one insulated conductor
SizeTHHNTHWN-2XHHWXHHW-2RHHno coverRHHwith coverTWTHW
14 AWG0.00970.01390.02090.02930.0139
12 AWG0.01330.01810.02600.03530.0181
10 AWG0.02110.02430.03330.04370.0243
8 AWG0.03660.04370.05560.08350.0437
6 AWG0.05070.05900.07260.10410.0726
4 AWG0.08240.08140.09730.13330.0973
3 AWG0.09730.09620.11340.15210.1134
2 AWG0.11580.11460.13330.17500.1333
1 AWG0.15620.15340.19010.26600.1901
1/0 AWG0.18550.18250.22230.30390.2223
2/0 AWG0.22230.21900.26240.35050.2624
3/0 AWG0.26790.26420.31170.40720.3117
4/0 AWG0.32370.31970.37180.47540.3718
250 kcmil0.39700.39040.45960.62910.4596
300 kcmil0.46080.45360.52810.70880.5281
350 kcmil0.52420.51660.59580.78700.5958
400 kcmil0.58630.57820.66190.86260.6619
500 kcmil0.70730.69840.79011.00820.7901
600 kcmil0.86760.87090.97291.21350.9729
700 kcmil0.98870.99231.10101.35611.1010
750 kcmil1.04961.05321.16521.42721.1652
800 kcmil1.10851.11221.22721.49571.2272
900 kcmil1.23111.23511.35611.63771.3561
1000 kcmil1.34781.35191.47841.77191.4784

Square inches per conductor, including insulation and any jacket.

THHN / THWN / THWN-2
PVC insulation under a nylon jacket. The thinnest common building wire and by a wide margin the most used, so it is the default here.
XHHW / XHHW-2 / XHH / ZW
Cross linked polyethylene, no nylon jacket. It crosses over THHN twice: fatter from 6 AWG down, slightly slimmer from 4 AWG through 500 kcmil, and fatter again above that. Neither one is always the smaller.
RHH / RHW / RHW-2, no outer covering
The modern XLPE product, usually sold as USE-2 / RHH / RHW-2. This is the column to use unless the wire has a separate fibrous or neoprene jacket over the insulation.
RHH / RHW / RHW-2, with outer covering
Older rubber insulated wire carrying a braid or jacket over the insulation. Noticeably fatter: at 500 kcmil it is 28 percent more area than the same wire without the covering.
TW / THW / THHW / THW-2
Thermoplastic without a nylon jacket. Identical to the uncovered RHH column from 6 AWG up, and slimmer than it below that.

How the calculation actually works

Conduit fill is one division. Add up the cross sectional area of everything going in the pipe, divide by the internal area of the pipe, and compare the result to a percentage. All the difficulty is in picking the right percentage and the right two areas.

Step one: the conduit's internal area

Trade size is a name, not a measurement. Half inch EMT has a bore of 0.622 inches, half inch rigid has 0.632, half inch schedule 40 PVC has 0.602 and half inch schedule 80 PVC has 0.526. Turned into area that spread is much wider than it looks: 0.304 square inches for the EMT against 0.217 for the schedule 80, a difference of 29 percent in the same nominal pipe. Schedule 80 has the same outside diameter as schedule 40 and a much thicker wall, and every thousandth of that wall comes out of the bore.

Area is pi over four times the diameter squared. Everything printed on this page is computed that way from a diameter, not looked up.

Step two: the conductors

Each insulated conductor has a published approximate diameter, which depends on the conductor size and on the insulation over it. Square it, multiply by pi over four, multiply by how many you have, and add the lot together.

Insulation matters more than people expect. A 500 kcmil conductor is 0.7073 square inches in THHN, 0.6984 in XHHW, and 1.0082 in rubber insulated RHH with an outer covering. That last one is 43 percent more pipe for exactly the same copper.

Count everything. Phases, the neutral, travellers, spares you are pulling for later, and the equipment grounding conductor. The ground occupies space like anything else and it counts toward the conductor total that selects your limit.

Step three: the limit

One conductor, 53 percent. Exactly two conductors, 31 percent. Three or more, 40 percent. A nipple of 24 inches or less between two enclosures, 60 percent.

A worked example

A feeder: three 3/0 THHN phase conductors and one 6 AWG THHN equipment ground, in EMT.

Conductor area
3/0 THHN is 0.584 inches across, so 0.2679 square inches each, and three of them is 0.8036. The 6 AWG ground is 0.254 inches across, so 0.0507. Total 0.8543 square inches.
The limit
Four conductors, so three or more, so 40 percent.
Try 1-1/4 inch EMT
Bore 1.380 inches, area 1.4954 square inches, 40 percent of that is 0.5982. We need 0.8543. Not close.
Try 1-1/2 inch EMT
Bore 1.610 inches, area 2.0358 square inches, 40 percent of that is 0.8143. We need 0.8543, so this is 41.96 percent full and it fails, by four hundredths of a square inch. It looks like it should fit and it does not.
Try 2 inch EMT
Bore 2.067 inches, area 3.3556 square inches, 40 percent is 1.3422. At 0.8543 the run is 25.5 percent full and it passes with plenty in hand.

The two conductor trap

Take two 6 AWG THHN conductors in half inch EMT. Each is 0.0507 square inches, so 0.1013 together, in a bore of 0.3039 square inches. That is 33.3 percent full.

Against 40 percent it passes with room to spare, and that is what most calculators and most people will tell you. But two conductors are held to 31 percent, which is 0.0942 square inches, and 0.1013 is over it. The run is illegal, and the tool that told you it was fine did so by applying the three or more rule to a case it does not cover.

The reason 31 is lower than both of its neighbours is that two circles in a circle waste space that three or more do not, and a two conductor pull has no third conductor to roll against. It is counterintuitive, it looks like a misprint, and it is the single most reliable source of wrong conduit fill answers there is.

Where this tool will mislead you

It does not derate for heat. More than three current carrying conductors in a raceway means their ampacity has to be reduced, and that is an entirely separate rule with its own table. Four to six conductors lose 20 percent of their ampacity, seven to nine lose 30 percent. A run can sit at 35 percent fill and still be undersized once that is applied. This tool answers the fill question only. The ampacity and derating calculator does the other half.

It does not know about bends. Fill says nothing about how hard the pull will be. Total bend is capped separately, and a run at 39 percent through four bends is a different job from the same run in a straight line.

It uses standardised conductor diameters. Real wire from a real reel is usually within a few thousandths of the published figure and sometimes not. The published figure is what an inspector checks, so it is the right basis for a verdict, but it is not a promise about your reel.

It does not cover everything that goes in a pipe. Compact stranded conductors, bare conductors and multiconductor cables all have their own dimensions and none of them are here. For a multiconductor cable you use the actual outside diameter of the cable, and if there is exactly one of them in the raceway there is a further rule about non circular cables that this tool does not handle.

It is not an inspection. Your local jurisdiction may amend or may be on an older code cycle, and either can change the answer.

Terminology

Trade size
The name a conduit is sold under. Not its bore and not its outside diameter. Two conduits of the same trade size in different types hold different amounts.
Bore
Internal diameter. The only conduit dimension that matters for fill.
Equipment grounding conductor
The bonding conductor that gives fault current a path back. Counts toward fill and toward the conductor count, and never counts as a current carrying conductor for derating.
Nipple
A conduit run of 24 inches or less between two enclosures. May be filled to 60 percent.
Jam ratio
Conduit bore divided by conductor diameter, for three conductors of the same size. Between about 2.8 and 3.2 they can wedge at a bend.
kcmil
Thousands of circular mils, the area unit used above 4/0. A circular mil is the area of a circle one thousandth of an inch across, so it is a conductor area, not an insulated diameter.

Questions about conduit fill

What is the maximum conduit fill?

It depends on how many conductors are in the raceway, and there are three answers rather than one. One conductor may fill 53 percent of the internal area. Exactly two may fill 31 percent. Three or more may fill 40 percent, which is the case that covers nearly every real circuit.

There is a fourth: a length of conduit no more than 24 inches long between two boxes or cabinets is a nipple, and it may be filled to 60 percent whatever the conductor count.

All four are percentages of area, not of diameter. Doubling the diameter of a pipe quadruples what it holds.

Why is the limit for two conductors lower than for three?

Because it is a geometry problem, not a counting problem. Two round conductors sitting side by side in a round pipe leave a wedge of space above and below them that neither one can occupy, so the fraction of the bore that is actually usable is lower than you would guess. There is also nothing for them to roll against during a pull, so a two conductor pull binds more easily than a three conductor one.

Three or more conductors nest against each other and against the wall far more efficiently, so the allowance goes back up to 40 percent. Two conductors is the only place in the table where adding a conductor raises the limit, which is exactly why people get it wrong.

Does the ground wire count toward conduit fill?

Yes. An equipment grounding conductor occupies space in the pipe, so it counts toward fill exactly like a phase conductor, and it counts toward the conductor count that selects the limit. Two phases plus a ground is three conductors, so 40 percent, not two conductors at 31 percent.

This tool has no separate slot for the ground on purpose. Add it as its own row with its own size, because it is usually smaller than the phases and giving it the same size would overstate the fill.

An insulated ground is covered by the insulation columns here. A bare ground uses a different dimension set that this tool does not carry, so its area is not included.

Does conduit fill tell me how many circuits I can run in one pipe?

No, and this is the single most common way a fill calculation misleads. Fill is a mechanical limit about pulling and about physical space. It says nothing about heat.

Once you have more than three current carrying conductors in a raceway, their ampacity has to be reduced, and the reduction is steep: four to six conductors lose 20 percent, seven to nine lose 30 percent, and it keeps going down from there. Neutrals may or may not count as current carrying depending on the system, and the equipment grounding conductor never does.

That is a separate rule with its own table, and this tool does not do it. A run can pass fill comfortably and still be undersized once derating is applied. The ampacity and derating calculator does that part.

What counts as a nipple?

A length of conduit no more than 24 inches long connecting two boxes, cabinets, gutters or similar enclosures. Not a 24 inch section in the middle of a longer run, and not a 24 inch stub with a free end.

A nipple may be filled to 60 percent, and the ampacity derating for more than three current carrying conductors does not apply to it either. Both allowances exist for the same reason: the run is too short for heat to accumulate and too short for the pull to be the difficulty.

What is jam ratio, and should I care?

Jam ratio is the conduit bore divided by the conductor diameter, and it matters when exactly three conductors of the same size are pulled together. If that ratio lands between roughly 2.8 and 3.2, the three can wedge.

The mechanism is worth knowing. At a bend the pipe deforms slightly and the bore in one axis opens up. That is enough for the middle conductor to drop between the outer two into a straight line rather than a triangle. When the pipe returns to round on the far side of the bend, the three are locked and the pull stops dead, usually with damaged insulation.

It is not a code violation and no inspector will fail you for it, which is why almost no online calculator mentions it. It is the reason a pull that passed fill on paper will not go in. Moving one trade size in either direction takes you out of the window.

Do I use the same numbers for aluminium conductors?

Only if the aluminium is conventionally stranded. Most large aluminium building wire is compact stranded, which is a genuinely smaller conductor for the same kcmil: compact 500 kcmil XHHW is about 13 percent less area than the standard figure.

Compact conductors have their own published dimensions and this tool does not carry them, so using the numbers here for compact aluminium will overstate your fill and may push you into a larger conduit than you need. That direction of error is safe but expensive.

The tool says 39.8 percent. Am I fine?

On paper, yes. In the pipe, be careful.

The conductor diameters used here are the standardised approximate diameters the calculation is defined against, and real product does not match them exactly. Southwire 500 kcmil THHN measures about 0.931 inches against a standard figure of 0.949; other manufacturers run over the standard figure at the same size. Manufacturing tolerance moves it again.

An inspector checks against the standard figure, so a result under the limit is a result that passes. But a pull sitting a fraction under the line, especially with several bends in it, is a pull that will fight you. If you have the option, take the next size up.

Where these numbers come from, and what is not reproduced here

The fill percentages and the jam ratio window are rules. They are stated in this project's own words above, and no table text, note text or commentary from NFPA 70 is reproduced anywhere on this page. The National Electrical Code is copyrighted by the NFPA, who make it free to read online. Free to read is not a licence to republish, and this page does not.

The dimensions are a different thing. Conduit bores and conductor outside diameters are physical measurements of manufactured products, published independently by the people who make them and by the product standards they are made to. This page stores diameters and computes every area from them at run time, rather than reprinting an area column.

Conduit bores were checked against at least two independent sources each. Steel conduit against Engineering ToolBox dimension tables and against ANSI C80.1 and C80.3 wall thicknesses. PVC schedule 40 and 80 were derived independently from Nominal Pipe Size outside diameters and ASTM D1785 wall thicknesses, which reproduce every figure without reference to any electrical source. Intermediate metal conduit was settled by a mass balance: the published weight per hundred feet, at the density of steel, gives a metal cross section that confirms the smaller of the two candidate bores at all nine sizes.

Conductor diameters were verified against two independent transcriptions that agree on all 120 figures used here, and then sanity checked against published product data from Southwire, Encore Wire and Prysmian. Real product straddles the standardised figure in both directions, which is why the FAQ above says what it says about a result at 39.8 percent.

What is deliberately absent. Compact stranded conductors, bare conductors and multiconductor cables are not included, because each needs a dimension set this page does not carry and guessing at them would produce a confident wrong answer. Bores for flexible metal and liquidtight flexible metal conduit rest on fewer independent sources than the rigid types and are marked as such where they appear.

This is a calculator, not an inspection and not legal advice. If a figure here disagrees with your code book or with something you have measured, tell me and it gets fixed.